Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Z. Blazevich (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:53, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Z. Blazevich[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This closed as no consensus in the 2013 AfD with one keep and one delete. I found no significant coverage for this person and none were presented in the first AfD. SL93 (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 06:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom and there is a lack of GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Subject has been covered a fair bit by multiple reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.75.172 (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- sources do not establish notability; Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.