Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wesley (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Wesley (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is unsourced and it fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While the article is lousy, more than 100 credits over five decades, including recurring roles in about a half dozen US network TV series, creates a pretty strong presumption of notability that the cursory nomination statement does nothing to undermine. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NACTOR having a large number of roles including prominent roles in notable fims and television shows ( notable meaning having wiki articles). will look for RS to add to the article. Update: have now added references to the article so it is no longer unsourced. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable for the needed improvements for solid notability, there's nothing outstanding to suggest a better article. SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 02:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. Lousy article needing improvement, but subject passes WP:NACTOR having many roles over long career. MB (talk) 02:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.