Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Turman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 23:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Turman[edit]

John Turman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:FILMMAKER, WP:N and WP:BEFORE returned nothing. The article has been sourceless, pretty much, since its creation. The only external link is WP:IMDB. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 02:09, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Per norm. Only source present is an IMBd link which is not an WP:RS. A search on GNEWS provides me with 2 hits which are only passing mentions of the subject. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.