Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John T. Grant (Rockland County politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John T. Grant (Rockland County politician)[edit]

John T. Grant (Rockland County politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL as a county-level politician and the single source doesn't establish WP:GNG. For reference, his predecessor's article was deleted last year. GPL93 (talk) 19:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:59, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete county exectives are not default notable, sourcing not great enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. County executives are not handed an automatic notability freebie under WP:NPOL just because they exist — the lowest level of political office that automatically guarantees a Wikipedia article is the state legislature, not county anything. To actually be deemed notable, rather, he would need to be able to show a depth and range and volume of reliable source coverage about him that clearly marks him out as a special case of significantly greater notability than most other county executives — but the only references here are his son's profile on the self-published website of the county government itself and an entry about his funeral on an unreliable blog, not reliable or notability-supporting sources. Bearcat (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.