Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Redcorn (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Redcorn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is pure original research and in-universe essay. Sources do not cover the subject in any detail. Prior discussion at [1] seemed to indicate these should be sent individually, not as a group. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 01:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination seems confused and contradictory. One moment it claims that this is "pure original research", the next it talks of the sources. In fact there is extensive coverage of the topic out there in sources such as Tribal Television: Viewing Native People in Sitcoms and so any flaws in the current draft should be addressed by our editing policies WP:IMPERFECT and WP:PRESERVE rather than deletion. Andrew (talk) 13:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Andrew above. MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew. Improve the article if necessary, do not delete.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 16:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew. VMS Mosaic (talk) 22:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ddcm8991 and Andrew, the article might need some improvement, but that's not a reason for deletion. Smile Lee (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.