Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Pylka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Overall consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Pylka[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His article survived PROD in 2010 but the sources are not reliable, notability is not demonstrated and the subject of the article is not significant. Mccapra (talk) 22:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete (SOFT) - GNG/BASIC is relevant here, and I just don't think it is met. Certainly not for the two sources accessible and not in other sources I could find. There is some reliable coverage, but in those, Sig Cov isn't satisfied. I've made it weak for his frequent presence indicating that the book coverage might well cover the man himself in some detail. However, one source, unless amazing, wouldn't be sufficient for GNG. I actually think the event could get enough, so a soft delete is my preferred option. Nosebagbear (talk) 23:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sourcing is very poor. A search turns out no reliable sources. Lapablo (talk) 10:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.