Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Powers (mayor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 03:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Powers (mayor)[edit]

John Powers (mayor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a mayor is not a default sign of notability. We have nothing here that would come even close to showing the passing of GNG. I was looking for sources, but what I came up with were his LinkedIn page, a blog run by the local newspaper giving the history of all the mayoral races for the last decade or so from when it was written, ad passing mention in a local newspaper. Nothing that adds up to the level of coverage to show notability John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason why the fact of The Spokesman-Review or Spokane Journal of Business being local should disqualify them as reliable sources. According to the The Spokesman-Review's Wikipedia article, It has the third highest readership among daily newspapers in [Washington] state. userdude 04:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per userdude. In addition to those sources, I also found this article in the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin which is entirely about Powers. There are also a number of other articles in the Union-Bulletin and the Centralia Chronicle which mention Powers, and per the GNG, the subject "does not need to be the main topic of the source material". Surachit (talk) 18:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.