Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John P. Ginty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John P. Ginty[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsuccessful candidate fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. KidAd • SPEAK 22:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - obscure ideologue, has lost a few races, obtained nothing but routine mentions in a horserace style. Fails any test of notability I can think of. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Easily fails WP:NPOL. and meets no other notability criteria. Curbon7 (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NPOL not met.Tec Tom (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Creator This is an article created more than 15 years ago that hasn't improved with time to meet the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per rationale by KidAd, they are extremely competent in political related topics. Celestina007 (talk) 01:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007, you're too kind. KidAd • SPEAK 01:53, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KidAd, thanks, although there are some editors who wouldn’t agree with you on that and argue that I’m a mean an evil witch, it’s refreshing to hear someone call me kind. Thanks mate. Celestina007 (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete candidates for state legislature are never notable for that fact. While in a few cases actual winners of the nomination for senate are notable, people who loose in the prmary for senate are virtually never notable. There is clearly not the truly indepdth coverage of Ginty to make him one of the super extremely rare exceptions to these rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. Lost badly in his only race. Bearian (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.