Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John P. Curley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John P. Curley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

County politician, fails WP:POLITICIAN, I'm not seeing anything beyond routine local coverage. Rusf10 (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Daask (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, has not held statewide office, fails NPOL. No notability found per WP:GNG. Coverage of this topic is strictly local in nature. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources, as flimsy and few-in-between as they are, are routine and are not indicative of a subject that passes GNG.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the available sourcing does not come close to establishing notability. SportingFlyer talk 18:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable yet. WP:BLP fail. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 23:22, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.