Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Nassari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:30, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Nassari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet the standards for creative artists--no third party substantial critical studies , no works in permanent collections of major museums The prizes mentioned are mostly just runners up or honourable mention, and even the ones he won are not ones that confer notability.

"Among the best nn wedding photographers" in a general newspaper article on weddings is not significant coverage.

The many references are just links to his works DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing does not add up to meeting the notability requirements for artists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of reliable sources PangolinPedia 07:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.