Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Moule[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP about a headteacher is sourced to Debrett's, which is considered reliable, to Who's Who, which is in the list of perennial sources as unreliable, and to his articles in the HuffPost, which is not an independent source. I have not been able to find references to add. The article does not meet WP:THREE, and I don't think Moule is notable according to WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Authors, Schools, United Kingdom, and England. Tacyarg (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is the best I could find, he made changes to the school's crest and ppl didn't like it [1]. Delete for lack of sourcing Oaktree b (talk) 15:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Functionally agree with Oaktree b. All sourcing for the subject is in relation to him being Warden of Radley College during XYZ event, but they don't seem to satisfy SIGCOV for him specifically. —Sirdog (talk) 08:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom., Who's Who does not show presumed notability and headmasters are not inherently notable. No sign he passes WP:NAUTHOR nor WP:GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable as of yet. Lorstaking (talk) 13:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.