Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moore (American director)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete , unreferenced BLP. The only arguments to keep are speculation and the supposition that there may be sources about his single film, both of which were already covered in delete arguments. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 20:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Moore (American director)[edit]

Fails WP:BLP1E (If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a particular event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, low profile, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted.) A single award in a limited entry film festival does not necessarily merit notability. Trevor Marron (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if the film were notable, the director is not notable until covered in reliable, independent sources (none appear to exist). No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BIO. Johnuniq (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article doesn't even tell how much he "helped". Niteshift36 (talk) 07:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep and expand and further source the article. As both his work as writer/director/producer/actor in The Widow's Might seems to actually have quite a bit of coverage. Might improve the encyclopedia to let this stub properly grow. If not, then a keep and discussion of merge to the film's article is well worth considering. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
John Moore and his crew plan to make more films. If we delete it now we might just have to make it again later, whereas we could just expand it now and save time. Just a thought. Invmog (talk) 04:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.