The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Docask? 19:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Important though he may be for the UK socialist movement I don't think that he is quite notable enough to have a wikipedia entry JK the unwise 18:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable enough, and not only in the UK (although that should already be reason enough if we want to counter the present strong US bias). LambiamTalk 20:03, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Meets WP:BIO as an author, if nothing else. -- MarcoTolo 21:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarcoTolo. Stifle (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
