Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Masouri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Masouri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Does not meet WP:N. Sabih omar 19:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, and England. Shellwood (talk) 20:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject of the article seems pretty much notable journalist from a Google search and having quoted in BBC and Vice establishes its notability. IBuNeriPK (talk) 17:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 13:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, seems to be the expert on the history of this type of music [1]; Vice seems to be an iffy source RS-wise, but I think with what's in the article we have enough. He's quoted a few times in peer-reviewed journals [ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22John+Masouri%22] as well. Oaktree b (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 21:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment here is some in-depth sigcov of his first book [2] —siro χ o 03:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nom doesn't exactly elaborate on why he fails N. The sources in the article demonstrate WP:NBASIC to me. He was also interviewed in BBC Radio as an expert. SWinxy (talk) 17:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.