Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Marsh (newsreader)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Marsh (newsreader)[edit]

John Marsh (newsreader) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

yet another full resume without notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:25, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete One newspaper article (of unknown source and date) not enough for GNG. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Radio presenters are in the public eye (in this case ear), so that people like to know who they are. If there is a problem over sourcing, the answer is to tag it for improvement. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.