Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kneski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 01:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
John Kneski[edit]
- John Kneski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable academic and former gallery owner. Fails WP:PROF (essentially no mentions in Google Scholar) and WP:CREATIVE. Coverage in independent sources (all from the early 1990s, and none immediately verifiable) appears limited to the gallery and its exhibits, not in-depth biographical information about the subject himself. Hqb (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete It's possible he has genuine press coverage, but a lot of the citations look irrelevant, very weak, or to self-published sources. Some references appear almost intentionally deceptive. I think we have to require a further demonstration of notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.