Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Holborow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 18:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Holborow[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply nothing to suggest better notability and improvement so unless there are some sources I'm missing, there's nothing to suggest keeping this article from October 2006 and this is easily speedy and PROD material. Pinging past user J04n. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (collogue) 10:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 16:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Billboard citation in the article is a passing reference. I found a couple more [1] [2], but they're both perfunctory directory-style listings in industry-specific outlets; not sufficient to demonstrate notability. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable and no claim of significance. This should have been put for CSD. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.