Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Palmieri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John H. Palmieri[edit]

John H. Palmieri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biographical article with no sources independent of the subject. Not obviously more notable than a typical tenured research mathematician. PROD deleted without comment by article creator (SPA and possible COI). JBL (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet any of the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A GS h-index of 14 [1] seems decent for pure mathematics, but maybe still on the low side? XOR'easter (talk) 17:32, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No independent sources, and I had trouble finding some. The h-index is indeed still on the low side. No significant claim of notability made in the article. talk to !dave 15:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.