Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John H. Morgan (Pilot)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete due to the sources provided being either not sufficiently reliable according to our standards, or not providing significant coverage of this person in particular. RL0919 (talk) 16:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John H. Morgan (Pilot)[edit]

John H. Morgan (Pilot) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this biography is amply referenced, it looks as if none of the source are at the same time indepth and reliable. The source with the most content is probably Honorstates, which is basically a wiki. The oral history source is a primary source, and has little about the pilot anyway. The third important source is the Stardust studios, again not a reliable source. Fram (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:BASIC as most of the sources are not reliable or independent. "notable for being one of the first forty-three African American combat fighter pilots ever" please... I note with concern that the creator has also created pages for a number of other Tuskegee Airmen who similarly seem to fail notability. Mztourist (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, these others are a rather mixed bunch as well. Some are notable for other reasons (e.g. Archie Harris (athlete) or Joe Adams (actor)), and the first group of 6 graduates may be more notable for being the first: but many of the others seem to have the same issues as this one. But it seemed safest to start with a single nomination and take it from there. Fram (talk) 13:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:GNG.Sources used in the areticle leave much to be desired, but sources do exist. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Which of these sources are WP:RS that give significant attention to the subject? Fram (talk) 10:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      [1][2] You haven't presented anything to back up your claim that sources supplied are unreliable. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • And the second source[4] are passing mentions, and the book is self-published. So no, no reliable sources, and certainly none with significant attention for this person. Fram (talk) 07:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.