Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Garlock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Garlock[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. The Bible Institute referenced is little more than a community centre. All the sources are highly partisan evangeical christian. Nothing independednt and reliable. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, South Africa, and United States of America. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks adequate sourcing in independent reliable sources. I see similar issues with H. B. Garlock. Reywas92^Talk 19:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.