Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John E. Rocha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. لenna vecia 15:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John E. Rocha[edit]

While the article proves that John Rocha studied under notable figures, the article does not illustrate that John Rocha is himself notable according to Wikipedia's standards. Darthoutis (talk) 01:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I will watch the AfD in case anyone comes up with some independent sourcing with substantial coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 06:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any sign of passing WP:PROF, and the article as it stands has major WP:BLP problems: it's filled with details that are not supported by reliable sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find anything in GS and there do not appear to be any other possibilities for notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Absolutely non-notable per WP:NOTE and WP:PROF both. Drawn Some (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.