Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John E. Bacon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John E. Bacon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors don't meet WP:POLITICIAN and I couldn't establish that he meets WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Stub, fails WP:GNG. This is a better summary of his 3-year diplomatic career, but we don't need it. This was a miserable period in the history of Paraguay, and it would be interesting to know what he did there. Without that, no reason to keep the article. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An alternative to deletion could be to redirect to United States Ambassador to Uruguay or United States Ambassador to Paraguay, but I wouldn't know which was more appropriate or if by selecting one other the other, it could cause confusion. ALso 'John E. Bacon' isn't particularly specific, there are others who may have this middle initial. Boleyn (talk) 21:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete ambassadors are not inherently notable, he needs to meet WP:BIO and there us no evidence he does. LibStar (talk) 12:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic ^{(talk | contribs)} 17:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.