Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dixon (Wisconsin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Dixon (Wisconsin)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL, article doesn't have anything that causes it to pass. No notable Ghits either. Kirbanzo (talk) 22:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NPOL, as Dixon served in the Wisconsin State Assembly, a state legislature. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 23:48, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see that. Thanks for pointing that out. Not going to withdraw nomination in order to allow debate, however. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per above passes wp:npol. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above reasons-thank you-RFD (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the SNG (WP:NPOL) is met. The state Blue Book and an obituary probably wouldn't meet WP:GNG as primary sources, but are enough for verification. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:NPOL easily. -- Dane ^talk 03:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.