Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Decyk

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Decyk[edit]

John Decyk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

All nonsense. Nothing on this guy anywhere. CSD G3 was turned down. --aktsu (t / c) 23:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. --aktsu (t / c) 23:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, CSD A7. TJRC (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. I don't believe this is a valid A7, because he lists an extensive list of "Championships and accomplishments." Other than that, I am not qualified to comment on his notability. Dcoetzee 23:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'd like to say speedy delete under G3 as "blatant and obvious misinformation", but it's not actually blatant, just wrong. Cool3 (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definitly delete. This guy is an obvious phony. He has never fought pro mma. just some kid in a basement trying to be cool by making a fake mma profile for himself. Nobody has ever heard of him nor any of the organizations he has supposidly fought for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RKing85 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Probably a hoax, No sources for a assertions of notability and the feel of the article is a self-promotion piece or joke page. --Nate1481 08:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, one of the links is even broken and there are no refs. No secure third party refs, no article. I also agree with Nate comments, I get the same feeling. --Artypants, Babble 17:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unverifiable, and likely hoax. The section titled "Professional Wrestling (professional In His Mind)" says it all for me. -- Whpq (talk) 18:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Its a hoax. He's not in any fight database online that I have checked. -- Webprofessor (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You know normally the only time I look at this thing is when I am told children come on here and edit it that im gay or phony or fake so i fix it so the facts are there. Now you people want to come on here and delete it because well it dosen't sound true to me so it definately is not true? Come on I thought you people were more inteligent then that but hey I guess thats how things go you bust your ass your whole life to acomplish a little something and then you book worm computer cowboys come on here and bash me knock me down then say im phony? You know what just delete it then cause this proves to me that Wikipedia is not a website of information its a dictator that says whats right and whats wrong no facts just "Hmm he did alot with his life, he's just trying to get a little respect for time he put in, NAH Lets just say he is fake and delete it all." You know what if this is the type of information you people want to put up based on what you think is true or not then do me the favor and delete it but the people who paid there hard earned money for a ticket to come watch me fight they will know its true. You can delete me from your records but you can't delete me from the minds of the people who know the truth. John Decyk.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.218.251 (talk)
  • John, all you need to do to prove people wrong is give us a link to one of your fight videos. That's all you have to do. Until then, this wiki entry is the biggest piece of bullcrap I have seen in a long, LONG time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RKing85 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, you say you have wrestled Randy Savage. You also say you started wrestling in 2002 (age of 17). Randy Savage has only wrestled in TNA since he stopped working for WCW. He has not wrestled any independent shows since then. So there is no way you could have wrestled Randy Savage. At least make up stuff that could be true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RKing85 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Assuming you are John Decyk (69.248.218.251), I'm afraid you are totally out of touch with the Wikipedia. The Wikipedia has Rules and Guidelines, and as Editors we try to follow them. You also state that: "You know normally the only time I look at this thing is when I am told children come on here and edit it that im gay or phony or fake so i fix it so the facts are there", I take it by "this thing", you mean the Wikipedia, but John Decyk article was started by JamManJohnDecyk on 7 September 2007 and with interesting edits by 68.32.140.61 and 69.140.24.104. Some one has now looked closely at your page and realised it is not correct for the Wikipedia. What are required are independent third party references. Have a look at WP:BIO. Artypants, Babble 16:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please DELETE, this guy is not a professional MMA fighter. There are no fights listed in any of the official MMA databases or any fighter information listed. This is made up. Obsessis (talk) 17:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • MISINFORMATION! this guy is not a PRO MMA FIGHTER, period!!!!! HOAX HOAX HOAX, wikipedia is better than this!!!! sherdog the guys name for crying otu loud, lol, seriously —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.141.99 (talk) 18:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Guys like this are the entire reason for encyclopedias. He has plenty of references, they just need to be listed!
All very credible sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.21.38.66 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment. The cited URLs are all derived from the Wikipedia article. Dcoetzee 19:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE PLEASE - THIS GUY IS A GREAT FIGHTER AND AMBASSADOR TO THE SPORT OF MIXED MARTIAL ARTS - OUR SPORT IS STRUGGLING FOR MAINSTREAM ACCEPTANCE AS IS, WE DON'T NEED TO FIGHT TO STAY ON WIKIPEDIA NOW TOO DO WE?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.163.110 (talk • contribs)
  • DO NOT DELETE THIS AS HE IS AN ACTUAL FIGHTER, THE PEOPLE HE HAS DEFEATED ARE JEALOUS OF HIS ACCOMPLISHMENTS.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.99.5.23 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment This IP is macman1000 from this forum discussion, has no edits except to this discussion, and is posting in bad faith. He also posted "I just erased all of the complaints to delete his WIKI page and left nothing but possitive comments!!!!!!!" Um, good for you. Dcoetzee 19:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Based on assessments of other Wikipedians, and an extensive thread about this hoax, it's pretty clearly made up. Like many Internet culture phenomenons, it's likely to attract some bad-faith supporters. Dcoetzee 19:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: How long until we can call this WP:SNOWBALLed? TJRC (talk) 19:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as per Dcoetzee; blatant hoax (proven) Regards, FM [ talk to me | show contributions ]  20:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per everything above. Looks like a general hoax page and something someone added about themselves. - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 20, 2009 @ 20:47
  • Delete as hoax per all above, esp. Dcoetzee. Although I'm sure it was added by someone else, I think the sentence in the present article most likely to be true is: "His family is extremely embarrassed of him for his continual lies about his fanatsy MMA and Pro-wrestling career." JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this has been around here since it was created in september 2007 by JamManJohnDecyk. It should have been speedy deleted right then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanoNL (talk • contribs)
  • Delete Speedy delete any future versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clausewitz01 (talk • contribs) 00:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Reverted to originally nominated version and protected for 3 days. The forum kiddies at [1] are having a bit too much fun with the vandalism, and this is a BLP, hoax or not. Dcoetzee 02:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - WP:HOAX. Matt (Talk) 07:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/John_Decyk&oldid=1140139037"