Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Collinson (soldier)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Collinson (soldier)[edit]

John Collinson (soldier) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Obviously not notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - way short of notable - SimonLyall (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as failing to have in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, as per the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No notability whatsoever. Junior officer. No apparent significant decorations. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.