Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John C. Anderton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Birds of South Asia. The Ripley Guide. MBisanz ^talk 21:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John C. Anderton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: insufficiently notable individual. Serious COI issuesd; editor who created article called Andertonian. Quis separabit? 20:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will not edit this page again if it means keeping it up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andertonian (talk • contribs) 22:59, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG with no substantial coverage from in-depth, independent reliable sources. GAB^gab 23:03, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I made a good faith search for independent reliable sources discussing Anderton and found nothing. The only source in the article is the book he illustrated, which is not independent so does not establish notability. Andertonian, we do not make deals like that and you should not be editing the article anyway due to your conflict of interest. If you want the article saved, then bring forth reliable sources. That is all that matters in this debate. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When is the research due? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andertonian (talk • contribs) 23:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andertonian, Articles for Deletion debates normally last one week, although they may be extended to two or three weeks if consensus is unclear. If the article is deleted from encyclopedia main space, then userfication is an option. The article could be turned into a draft for further work. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable ornithologist and illustrator. Johnpacklambert (talk) 07:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, the book he has illustrated could be covered under point 3 of WP:NARTIST ie. "3.The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.", the book does have a wikiarticle, but whether this is enough to warrant a standalone article for him? .. a few lines about him could be added to that article. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article was not created by Andertonian. Gulumeemee (talk) 05:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.