Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Lawrence (photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn, the nominator being the only editor in favor of Deletion prior to that withdrawal. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Lawrence (photographer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Only sources are a personal website, personal blog, and a blog interview. None are reliable. Cind.amuse 05:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are plenty of sources, and as creator of the Twilight posters (whatever I may personally think of that ~~shite~~ series) I believe he passes WP:CREATIVE. I went to add the sources and the computer crashed. I'm too frustrated to enter it all again now, but a search for "Joey Lawrence" photographer in the Google News Archives shows several articles on him as a young and extremely good photographer. He was interviewed by MTV and his documentary on photographing Ethiopian Elders is very interesting. - ManicSpider (talk) 09:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —ManicSpider (talk) 09:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. —ManicSpider (talk) 09:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops Forgot this guy - I'll go find those sources again now. - ManicSpider (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep based on ManicSpider's excellent improvements and added sources[1]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do agree we now have the WP:RS -- especially with that National Post profile -- to indicate notability. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw due to sufficient reliable sources to support notability. Cind.amuse 09:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.