Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Debus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE, although the article was deleted during the discussion as a hoax under CSD:G3. Bilby (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Debus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, the subject is not the subject of the sources provided and "great potential" doesn't equate to notability Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable, fails WP:POLITICIAN and every other test. Sources are non-specific. Blatant self-promotion. WWGB (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Is this political "rising star" old enough to vote? Fails WP:V and WP:POLITICIAN. Without the bogus references, this is an unsourced and unverifiable BLP. No reliable source coverage found in search. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notable achievements. suspected WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 00:08, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incredibly obvious delete. Clear WP:AUTOBIO, failing every conceivable notability guideline. (As an aside, I wonder if he's related to Bob?) Frickeg (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, no notability (even possible hoax), references are faked, google search gives zero good results. --Soman (talk) 00:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Per everyone above and WP:WoT. Sam Sailor ^Sing 11:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and possibly even WP:GNG and WP:BIO since, beyond telling us he's a "rising star" in the party the article doesn't explain why he's notable. Paul MacDermott (talk) 11:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and possible hoax....William 14:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.