Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Wren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Wren[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent autobiography and unreferenced BLP by a "Reality Show producer" and "Internet celebrity" (read: young man with a YouTube channel). Prod contested by page creator Dogliker8. Non-notable per WP:GNG and WP:WEB. Cnilep (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Cnilep (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Cnilep (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - I can't find anything that accords any notability to any Joe Wren. The page fails so many policies and guidelines, esp. WP:BLP, WP:CITE and looks like a user's first editing test. Possibly good faith and not vandalism but it's really something that should be in a sandbox, and should probably not be left in article space in its present form. To judge by the dob & age in the bare tpl it could be the work of a child. Suggest the editor work on this some more in his user space and find some reliable VRs before posting to article space.--Kudpung (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an apparent test page. Best to advise new author on how to create and use a sandbox. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mr. C.C. (talk) 23:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't find any single slight hint at notability. _noisy jinx ^huh? 02:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.