Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Sulzer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 15:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Joe Sulzer[edit]
- Joe Sulzer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced BLP page, tagged with notability concern by another user. -- Cirt (talk) 12:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As I was the one who gave the NYT cite, I think that it is not really a "poor" cite. Sulzer decidedly meets notability requirements - many cites from Ohio papers are around. Is "notability" being given as the sole real reason for deletion? If so I commend the following for attention: [1], [2], [3] show he is regualrly mentioned in local media. It is definitely not an "unreferenced" BLP. so I suggest that other BLPs should be a higher priority for weeding. [4] singled out as a candidate by Rahm Emmanuel. [5] transcript in Clinton's autobiography. He is not the most notable mayor in the US, but the WP standards are met. Collect (talk) 13:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep [Changed vote, see below, but keep the following to show weakness of these sources so they are not used in the article] As per the references that Collect has provided, [6], [7] are routine news coverage that only in passing mention Sulzer. While [8] is a profile of a completely different person, who just happened to be running against Sulzer. In [9] Sulzer is merely a moderator at a deabte Clinton was in, it is not, in anyway, about Sulzer himself. And I couldn't access number the other one. Overall, these references have no sustained, focused coverage that signify notability of any form to Sulzer. Ravendrop (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP does not require "national notability" last I checked. He was a State Rep, Mayor, and Congressional candidate of a major party. He got mentioned in the national press. He has many mentions in local press as Mayor. Note the applicable criteria include "members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislature" which 8includes Sulzer. " mayors of cities of at least regional importance are likely to meet this criterion " also includes Sulzer (Chillicothe is a former capital of Ohio). He meets two criteria for a politician being notable in the WP guideline - which is one more than is needed. Collect (talk) 22:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I missed the part where he was elected to the Ohio House of Representatives, which does qualify him under WP:Politician. Still believe the article is in need of some work, but that alone isn't a reason for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added an infobox to make his 'notability' more obvious so this debacle won't repeat itself later, although I find it difficult to believe so many of you "didn't notice" he was a member of the state legislature. It's not as if this was a long article, or that his service there was only mentioned in passing. However, I will Assume Good Faith on your part(s) that you actually read past the first line of the article. Flatterworld (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I missed the part where he was elected to the Ohio House of Representatives, which does qualify him under WP:Politician. Still believe the article is in need of some work, but that alone isn't a reason for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP does not require "national notability" last I checked. He was a State Rep, Mayor, and Congressional candidate of a major party. He got mentioned in the national press. He has many mentions in local press as Mayor. Note the applicable criteria include "members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislature" which 8includes Sulzer. " mayors of cities of at least regional importance are likely to meet this criterion " also includes Sulzer (Chillicothe is a former capital of Ohio). He meets two criteria for a politician being notable in the WP guideline - which is one more than is needed. Collect (talk) 22:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.