Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe O'Brien Field

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Obviously we're going to Speedy Delete!. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe O'Brien Field[edit]

Joe O'Brien Field (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

totally useless Magicsan (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • May not meet WP:GNG in which case redirect and merge to Elizabethton Twins. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep. Nominatiors rationale makes no sense. "Totally useless" is not a reason to delete anything and this is a stadium used by a professional baseball team. Spanneraol (talk) 12:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – it is easy to find sources for the stadium by following the 'find sources' links in the nom. Oculi (talk) 01:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Spanneraol (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In part for the terrible AfD reasoning, also because it is notable. Alex (talk) 16:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - No basis provided for deleting. Rlendog (talk) 19:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.