Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe LaFratta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No argument or evidence argued for notability j⚛e decker ^talk 01:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe LaFratta[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this guy passes WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR, but it's full of BLP violations and/or promotional material (but not sure if it's enough to be speedy worthy), so if this guy is notable, I suggest TNTing this article and starting from scratch. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to failure of WP:BASIC. I searched and searched.... Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 13:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's not enough info to support the article. Ducknish (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing but WP:CIRCULAR and ineffectual WP:BOMBARD. No real WP:RS to establish WP:AUTHOR or anything else. Qworty (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication this person meets WP:GNG, either for WP:AUTHOR or WP:CRIMINAL. Mkdw ^talk 00:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.