Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Diaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I should note that sources being "partisan" is not a reason to delete an article, but that's irrelevant here as GNG is not met. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Diaz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notble boxing promoter. A conviction for fraud does not make one notable. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One line article with no claims of notability. Also lacks significant independent coverage.Mdtemp (talk) 18:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and NBOX (non-notable boxer).204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sources are partisan. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.