Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Boyd Vigil
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Joe Boyd Vigil[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joe Boyd Vigil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Successful, but doesn't meet any part of the criteria. Boleyn (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I have found no significant coverage in the independent reliable sources. There is a bunch of hits on user generated platforms, but that's all. Fails WP:GNG.Less Unless (talk) 20:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the sourcing does not come even remotely close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Not related to the very well known music producer Joe Boyd, despite sharing the name and both coming from Boston, which makes searching more complicated, but there's no evidence of this subject being mentioned outside of music-sharing platforms and social media. Richard3120 (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:32, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.