Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquín Carbonell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Joaquín Carbonell[edit]
- Joaquín Carbonell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, as he has never played for in a WP:FPL, never coached/managed in a FPL, and there is no evidence of meeting GNG, either here, or in Google. Even the Spanish Wiki doesn't appear to have this player there. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:16, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:19, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (constabulary) @ 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (speak) @ 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (converse) @ 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. He has never played or managed in a fully pro league, and he has not received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.