Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Bool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:01, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joanna Bool[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, I did find this however that alone isn't enough, All of her roles thus far all seem to be one-bit roles, Fails NACTOR and GNG, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 15:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 15:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not rise to the level of having had multiple significant roles in notable productions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She appears to have had five bit parts in various things, a one shot appearance in Lost doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article. Oaktree b (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage - fails WP:GNG. SK2242 (talk) 11:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.