Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joann Kelly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Joann Kelly[edit]

Joann Kelly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim made for notability. No RS that discusses her, only trivial mention in articles about her father. Fails WP:NMUSIC LK (talk) 06:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Sources proves notability. - AffeL (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: User:AffeL is the confirmed sockmaster of the banned account that originally created this page. LK (talk) 05:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Having a celebrity father and receiving coverage in the context of him is not sufficient to establish notabiliy for an independent article. She doesn't pass the WP:GNG on her own. - GretLomborg (talk) 16:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete All of the content that I can find is from articles about other people. She is not the subject of WP:RS content.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.