Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joann Condon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 15:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joann Condon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage and only one major role. SL93 (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Women. SL93 (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is far past time that Wikipedia stopped being an IMDb mirror.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of pieces about her, it's not exactly top quality, but want to hear from the nominator what you thought of these?

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/lifestyle/tv/little-britain-cast-now-bbc-23062368 (note this lists other roles, suggesting errors in the nomination justification)

https://www.shropshirelive.com/entertainment/2021/06/18/ludlow-fringe-festival-to-welcome-joann-condon/

Currently learning borderline keep CT55555 (talk) 00:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CT55555 I made no error because I said major roles. Little Britain is her only major role while the other ones were only for a few episodes. I'm not sure if the first source helps notability due to mentioning several cast members. SL93 (talk) 03:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. It was her only major role. CT55555 (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline Keep as mentioned above. Oaktree b (talk) 14:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep generally one could state that her person is a notable character in television. U Know I Know It (talk) 14:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes WP:NACTRESS. I added sources and citations to the article.4meter4 (talk) 20:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4meter4 Thank you. I would withdraw this, but I see that the AfD was supposed to be closed yesterday. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not eligible for a withdrawal, because another editor voted delete besides yourself. But the closer will see by your comment that your opinion has changed. At this point I think there is a clear keep consensus. Best.4meter4 (talk) 01:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I wish that rule would be changed somewhat since the comment is now invalid. SL93 (talk) 01:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.