Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Ho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jo Ho[edit]

Contested prod, I will point this out again like I pointed it on my PROD: Appears to be created by a WP:SPA user which I suspect is in fact a WP:COI user judging by the state of edits; lacks any reasonable WP:VERIFY other than promotional sites. Also fails WP:ARTIST. Donnie Park (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete as self-promotional advertising of nonnotable individual - The prod had been on the article for the required length of time for deletion, but it was deprodded by a sockpuppet of a banned editor shortly before the prod would have expired and before the sockpuppet investigation caught up with him. If this hadn't been listed for AFD the deprod would have been reverted (edits of block evasion banned editors are not valid -- I'm doing clean up after the sock right now) and the article would already be gone right about now anyway. Not sure if that's a speedy delete, or revert the AFD and go through with the prod delete or what, but the AFD should never have been necessary... on the other hand a consensus to delete through AFD is a good thing to have to prevent people restoring it later. DreamGuy (talk) 20:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.