Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jivko Petkov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 22:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Jivko Petkov[edit]
- Jivko Petkov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Football player who has not made a senior appearance, fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. doomgaze (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - hasn't played in a fully-professional league, so fails WP:NFOOTBALL; also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 12:34, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication of notability. Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 16:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 16:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article asserts its own non-notability. Clearly fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:35, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. - SudoGhost (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence this article passes any of our notability guidelines. Jogurney (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.