Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmie Lee (comedian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmie Lee (comedian)[edit]

Jimmie Lee (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR and WP:NMUSIC. Sources are almost all local entertainment rags, which are more local entertainment calendar than news. Works do not appear charts, and landing a role in a pilot does not establish notability. Being mildly - or even moderately - successful does not make one notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. ScrpIronIV 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC) ScrpIronIV 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete appears as a promotional for someone trying to make it in show business. Article was created by a now-banned user, it is constantly being edited by anon-IPs. While a few editors have worked diligently to convert the initial mess of the article into something worthwhile, it might be worthwhile to pull the plug on this WP:TOOSOON and wait for some reasonable level of meeting WP:ENTERTAINER.--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 22:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Basically entirely a promotion. Not surprising to see the SPI. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 23:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It is too soon. There is quite a bit of news coverage. Much of it strikes me as ROUTINE: even though it is written as in-depth coverage, it is written because he's going to be performing a particular show, which qualifies more as an announcement of an event. I'm concerned about independence since the sites promoting it stand to benefit. -- RM 14:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- has a ton of legitimate press that authenticates his shows and career

Also, has various different careers that are mentioned in various press articles, Notable person with three careers, impressive- SRB

  • Keep - Sources are real press coverage,with alot of bio and information on subject.

He has articles in detail about himself, as well as upcoming venues. Subject has multiple music albums(CD Baby) and has performed many comedy shows (YouTube) . Very talented and multifaceted person. - LLW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.111.243 (talk) 00:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's some coverage here of course but simply nothing actually confidently convincing. Delete for now at best, SwisterTwister talk 23:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.