Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim kwik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Yunshui under criterion A10. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim kwik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marketing-style text, no independent sources that could be used to estimate notability Tournesol (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've speedied this as duplicate of Jim Kwik. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.