Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Treacher (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Treacher[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is part of a group of inter-related articles (check the see also section). Some are or may be notable, but this one isn't. Only significance at all is a very minor single event. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 06:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 06:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E. Not notable for anything outside of the 'Obama Eats Dogs' meme. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 23:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:1EVENT (BLP1E might not technically apply since the person is seeking publicity and thus not low profile trying to protect privacy). -- GreenC 20:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The meme in which he is supposedly notable does not have all that much coverage or certainly no lasting effects. Mkdw ^talk 00:27, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.