Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Morris (Pixar)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The challenge was that Jim Morris is not notable and fails WP:BIO (which is also essentially a notability argument). The consensus is that Jim Morris is notable, and checkable evidence to support this view has been provided. NAC—S Marshall Talk/Cont 10:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]
Jim Morris (Pixar)[edit]
- Jim Morris (Pixar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable, fails WP:BIO Alan - talk 21:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Keep - *cough* General Manager of Pixar, the most succesful animation studio in the modern Western world. Sources here and here, among hundreds of others. I can't possibly believe that the nominator engaged in WP:BEFORE prior to making this nomination. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep General Manager of Pixar seems sufficiently notable to me (along with the other main people at the company), and there seem to be plenty of good references out there (though I haven't got time to dig out the best ones and add them) -- Boing! said Zebedee 02:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 02:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue (in the very unlikely chance that it would need it). SilverserenC 02:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added some links and references. This seems like a ridiculous nomination. SilverserenC 02:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.