Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim McLean (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim McLean (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely non-notable hockey player, no evidence he passes the GNG. Played only a handful of games in the low minors, fails WP:HOCKEY by a country mile, and I can't imagine for the life of me what notability criteria the article creator thought this fellow could remotely meet. Ravenswing 06:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 08:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He fails WP:NHOCKEY and doing a search for sources has turned up none. As to the rest of the nom's statement. He played in the British National League which used to (arguably) meet NHOCKEY #1 before it was updated. -DJSasso (talk) 13:19, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NHOCKEY and GNG. None of the leagues are considered a top professional league according to WP:NHOCKEY/LA. Patken4 (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.