Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Knox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was del `'mikka (t) 18:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Jim Knox[edit]
"is currently in the process of creating a TV show", Does a zookeeper count as being notable, when he hasn't done anything notable yet? Nekohakase 00:21, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn notable Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.--Shella * 00:46, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn, but I have to say (yet again) that I wish we had a NOTYET template that combined both crystal ball and notability--i.e., something that indicated that expunging the article in question is not necessarily a permanent thing. I worry for people who submit something like this, then get scared away when it's voted down. P L E A T H E R talk 01:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Something like this? Confusing Manifestation 10:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —Jared Hunt September 25, 2006, 05:23 (UTC)
- Redirect to Jim Knox's Wild Zoofari. Mgm|(talk) 12:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I'm not sure a redirect to a show that has not aired is the best course of action. The Jim Knox's Wild Zoofari article itself could be brought to AfD as a violation of WP:NOT a crystal ball.--Isotope23 18:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case you could kill the redirect for being un-used. When I read the article on the show it appeared to me it was in a far state of development and ready for broadcast in the near future. As soon as there's verifiable info on films we also get articles as long as we know for sure they'll be released (most often meaning they need to be announced by major studios). I didn't go into detail about the show, but I think it should be judged similarly to such film articles. - Mgm|(talk) 10:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not delete I created this article because Knox could be the next Steve Irwin. I do not know how to write a "proper" article like you, but please do not delete it, just change it to make it acceptable. Or, please add it to Jim Knox's Wild Zoofari. If you must, please delete "Jim Knox" not "Jim Knox's Wild Zoofari". Thank you
- Delete per nom GShton 21:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Isotope. Heimstern Läufer 08:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.