Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Henry (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Henry (musician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for musicians and bands and the general notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. De-PROD-ed by Michig along with several others. I was going to bundle these as nearly all of them cite no reliable sources that suggest they pass WP:BAND aside from database-style entries in AllMusic or affiliated sources and were created by the same user, however I am mindful of avoiding a trainwreck so I am nominating each of them individually. SITH (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 11:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG. One of a spate of prods by the nominator in a short space of time. I indicated when I deproded it that I found coverage, which they haven't asked about. Coverage includes [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], plus some I can't access in the UK. --Michig (talk) 16:48, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some of the recent "coverage" is basically identical to the Wikipedia article, see e.g. [6]. Bakazaka (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on notability grounds, at least, WP:MUSICBIO is satisfied by the sources indicated by Michig Nosebagbear (talk) 13:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 12:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.