Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Haldane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Haldane[edit]

Non-notable Vanity bio. Previously tagged for speedy deletion [1] but deemed not speedy-able [2]. I prodded it [3], but prod tag was contested (removed) [4] by anon whose only edits were to the article [5] Anon gave no reason for tag's removal, and is probably the author and subject of the article, Jjhaldane (contribs), just not logged in. I suggest deleting the article as vanity and failing WP:BIO. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nn and vanity. --Ter e nc e Ong 03:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Reid A. 03:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DVD+ R/W 04:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, possible vanity M1ss1ontomars2k4 05:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sorry Guy 05:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am the person who put this page on. I am trying to make sure it conforms with Wikipedia guidelines. Jim Haldane is a prominent local artist in Brighton (UK) and was exhibited at the Royal Academy of Art Summer exhibition and featured in the official catalogue. An exhibition of his work is currently being organised by Brighton Museum. John Cooper, head of exhibitions at the museum will verify this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jjhaldane (talk • contribs) .
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 10:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 11:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As an artist this guy may well deserve an article eventually, but with only one exhibition he's not notable at this time. Also, the page is clearly a vanity page; if it wasn't, that at least would be one argument for keeping it. Mango juice^talk 12:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The picture is from March and looks like a prank picture. The picture source doesn't mention Haldane, but some other person (suspect anyway because of the text).Ted 19:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.