Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill Stuart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing my nomination after the info located by Libby norman. No other delete !votes J04n(talk page) 19:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Stuart[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this BLP, plus no real claim of notability on the page. J04n(talk page) 18:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 18:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 18:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I hadn't heard of her as she's not so active on this side of the pond, but this profile in NYMAG [1] suggests she's more than just a few chokers. She's also featured in Elle Deco [2] and Elle [3] and Womenswear Daily – which is something of a gold standard [4]. And she has a page on Fashion Encyclopedia, which is usually reasonably well researched and provides refs for all its sources [5]. She has also blogged for Huffpo [6] and has a pretty reasonable write up in Wall Street Journal [7]. Definitely a keep, but with an improve tag – I work on the Fashion Project so don't mind taking this one on. Libby norman (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.