Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jill O'Sullivan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jill O'Sullivan[edit]

Jill O'Sullivan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has been sticking around the new pages queue since August, so I'm seeking consensus. Seems like a borderline case for WP:MUSICBIO based on [1] and [2], but I'm not absolutely clear on notability so am bringing it here. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 17:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild Keep Agree that it is borderline, needs more sourced material to push it over the top. Oaktree b (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 23:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild keep agree with above Balle010 (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - seems OK; she was a member of a notable trio. I would like to trim some of it down. Bearian (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, seems just about enough basis, but agree with others above that more referencing would really help. SeoR (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.